Patrick Henry or Death? The Republican Party’s Choice

May 28, 2015—This morning’s Fox and Friends highlighted GOP presidential candidate Chris Christie’s attacks on fellow contender Senator Rand Paul, tying him to Edward Snowden who Christie called “a criminal.”

Like what you’re reading? Keep going by contributing to the cause of freedom.


Fox News Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Napolitano corrected Christie, saying, “No, no, no, no, no, and Governor Christie, who’s a very bright lawyer and is the former chief federal prosecutor in New Jersey, knows that he is innocent ’til proven guilty.”

Fox host Brian Kilmeade interrupted, “But you think he’s a criminal?”

“No, I don’t think he’s a criminal.”

That left Kilmeade exasperated. Napolitano also said, “For the governor to call him a criminal when he knows, in fact, he’s innocent until proven guilty is a cheap political shot. Now, I was surprised at what Christie said. Because he also said, quote, ‘It is dangerous to be debating this.'”

Christie’s scare-tactics Voices-of-Liberty-Liberty-Minded-Multi-Channel-Network-•-Edit-Post4are all he has, and that’s why he’d rather not debate the issue. Napolitano wisely compared Christie’s words to that of the patriot Patrick Henry.

As foreign policy and national security bleed into violations of the Bill of Rights at home, Republican voters have to make a choice about the future of their party. It’s Patrick Henry or death.

Back in 2013, Judge Napolitano said that Christie and Paul personified that divide:

Do you think the Republican Party is moving towards Christie or Paul on the NSA? Share your thought below!

This article is hosted, designed, and promoted with the assistance of readers like you. Give a gift to keep VoicesofLiberty moving the message of liberty forward.

“Follow the Damn Constitution” Freshman Rep. Ted Lieu Tells NSA
Ted Cruz’s Reaction to the NSA Ruling Proves He’s a Fake on the Fourth
Chris Christie’s Impossible Promise: The Pot Crack Down Can’t Work